House of Sand and Fog

topic posted Mon, June 8, 2009 - 9:36 AM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Better than the movie. The female lead should have been a different person, I could never imagine Jennifer Connelly, in any form, snorting coke. Although perhaps in Labryinth, David Bowie gave her a little toot.
The Persian words flung like wet droplets and I can imagine some literature teacher photocopying the PG-rated chapters and having her students highlighting the words they don't understand and looking them up on Google.
I wish the ending had been cut off about a chapter shy.
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: House of Sand and Fog

    Mon, June 8, 2009 - 5:16 PM
    >>I could never imagine Jennifer Connelly, in any form, snorting coke. <<

    You obviously haven't seen "Requiem for a Dream." Snorting coke is child's play in comparison.


    I enjoyed this book although overall it was sooooooooo depressing and tragic. I liked that the narrative changed, but I wasn't impressed by some of the character development. It's been years since I've read this so I can't recall exactly what I did or didn't like, but overall I enjoyed it, it was a fast read. I just remember that parts of the characters were aggravating, not that all protagonists should be like-able... I just prefer them that way.
    • Re: House of Sand and Fog

      Tue, June 9, 2009 - 9:41 AM
      As I remember it, what bothered me was that I started the book really liking the main characters, but then they started making such idiotic choices, it drove me bananas!
      It got to the point where I didn't care what happened to them anymore, which sort of diluted the point of reading the book.
      Though of course it broke my heart worrying about the son, later on.

      Has the author written anything else? Was it any better?
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: House of Sand and Fog

        Tue, June 9, 2009 - 10:21 AM
        I often have that reaction to fictional characters who bring upon themselves their own problems for no good reason. More so in film that in books. Books can usually develop more sympathy and understanding of the character.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: House of Sand and Fog

        Tue, June 9, 2009 - 10:53 AM
        No, I have never seen "Requiem for a Dream" but will now...

        Don't you think that humans make idiotic choices anyway and that books like that are representative of the chilling adrenaline of stupidity, rage and ignorance that courses through all of us?

        A quick look on Amazon reveals some others, "Bluesman" and other seemingly interesting choices which I will now have to rent at the library.

        I agree that it was diluted, I wish it had ended with the wife/husband and that's it.

        The vog is bad in Hawaii today, we are being choked by the phlegm of Pele.
        • Re: House of Sand and Fog

          Tue, June 9, 2009 - 11:08 AM
          >>Don't you think that humans make idiotic choices anyway and that books like that are representative of the chilling adrenaline of stupidity, rage and ignorance that courses through all of us? <<

          I think you can have a protagonist that makes bad choices and one we might not even like that much, but at the very least we understand (the job of the narrative, right?). I think my issue was with this book that I never felt invested in the characters enough to "understand" their choices - it just became annoying and aggravating. It's that kind of discomfort I get when I watch a movie/show and I just can't avert my eyes, but something terrible and frustrating is happening (in comedy shows like "The Office" and "Arrested Development" they call it "squirm worthy" as I read once by a writer...). With "The House of Sand and Fog" I squirmed, but never enjoyed the discomfort, you know? Does that make sense? Anyway, I liked the book much more than the movie. I watched the movie with my husband and he said he felt very confused and in the dark - I told him a lot was told via narrative so that's why it felt somewhat empty in some scenes. It's difficult to convey a book into a movie and I just didn't like either enough, in this case, to be convinced.
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: House of Sand and Fog

            Tue, June 9, 2009 - 12:39 PM
            Exactly. If a work of fiction can get me invested in the character, then I will stand by no matter how stupid their choices. But if it does not strike any chord of sympathy or interest in the character, then why should I care? The problem is not with a character making bad choices, but rather with the character not generating any sympathy or interest.

            This is sometimes just a matter of personal preference. For example, most people I know who saw "Trainspotting" rave about the movie, but I could not get into it because I had no sympathy or interest in watching working class druggies from the UK. Just doesn't interest me, but that's just me, it's just my own personal taste and interest, based on my own life experiences with that crowd. It's not a criticism of the movie. I have to concede the movie probably deserves all the praise it got. I guess for most people, the characters were sympathetic even if they were losers.

Recent topics in "I just finished reading..."